Skip to main navigation menu Skip to main content Skip to site footer

Research Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Issue 1/2025

The Importance of Effective Institutional Frameworks in the EU Integration Process: Lessons from Bosnia and Herzegovina

Published
September 9, 2025

Abstract

The progress of Bosnia and Herzegovina in the process of EU integrations can be described as slow and difficult. Many reasons contribute to such development, starting with political instability. However, even in the case of absence of political difficulties, certain features of the constitutional and legal system of the country make decision-making at state level and conducting necessary reforms slow and ineffective. Bosnia and Herzegovina’s constitution is a part of a Dayton Peace Agreement, which was a result of long peace negotiations to end one of the bloodiest conflicts in the 1990’s. It achieved in stopping the conflict, but inserted many features which make reforms difficult, such as complicated decision-making process, fragmented state apparatus and division of competences between different levels of government. One of the features of the constitutional system is the set of group rights belonging to the so-called constituent peoples. The principle foresees certain procedural rules related to the parity in appointment of officials as well as necessary quotas and veto powers in the decision-making process in the legislative and executive bodies. Primarily seen as a compromise to bring back inter-ethnic trust, in recent years, it has been increasingly seen by European Institutions such as European Court of Human Rights and the European Commission, as discriminatory and ineffective, hampering the progress of the state on its path to EU integration. The European Court of Human Rights has in multiple cases described the realization of principle of constituent peoples as contrary to human rights standards. On the other hand, the EU institutions, such as European Commission, in its assessments of the readiness of Bosnia and Herzegovina to progress in EU integrations and potentially become a EU Member state, has pointed to the fact that realization of the principle is detrimental to the decision-making process. The non-compliance with the European Court of Human Rights decisions related to the discriminatory nature of the principle, has slowed the country’s EU integration process, even in the stage of signing of the Stabilization and Association Agreement, as is still an outstanding obligation.  All of that is negatively impacting institutional frameworks aimed at devising and implementing necessary reforms on the EU integration path. This article analyses the position of the principle of “constituent peoples” in the legal system of the country and its evaluation by the European institutions as detrimental to country’s progress.

References

  1. 1. Albi A and Bardutzky S (eds), National Constitutions in European and Global Governance: Democracy, Rights, the Rule of Law: National Reports (Asser Press 2019). doi:10.1007/978-94-6265-273-6 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-273-6
  2. 2. Banović D and Gavrić S (eds), Država, politika i društvo u Bosni i Hercegovini: Analiza postdejtonskog političkog Sistema (Magistrat 2011).
  3. 3. Colón-Ríos J, Constituent Power and the Law (OUP 2020). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198785989.001.0001
  4. 4. Dobbins J and others, Europe's Role in Nation-Building: From the Balkans to the Congo (Rand Corporation 2008) 145. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7249/MG722
  5. 5. Efendić K, ‘Konstitutivnost naroda u Bosni i Hercegovini: pregled teorijsko-pravnih i pojmovnih određenja’ (2018) 11(21) Anali Pravnog fakulteta Univerziteta u Zenici 61.
  6. 6. García-Herreros NF, ‘Legality, Legitimacy and Democratic Constitution Making’ (2019) 1 Jus Cogens 97. doi:10.1007/s42439-019-00007-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42439-019-00007-9
  7. 7. Luka B, 'The Integration Process of Bosnia and Herzegovina to the EU: 14 Priorities from the Opinion of the European Commission 4 Years Later' (Transparency International u Bosni i Hercegovini, 25 July 2023) <https://ti-bih.org/publikacije/proces-integracije-bih-u-eu-14-prioriteta-iz-misljenja-evropske-komisije-4-godine-poslije/?lang=en> accessed 15 July 2025.
  8. 8. Malloy TH, National Minority Rights in Europe (OUP 2012).
  9. 9. Pajić Z, ‘A Critical Appraisal of Human Rights Provisions of the Dayton Constitution of Bosnia and Herzegovina’ (2008) 20(1) Human Rights Quarterly 125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/hrq.1998.0009
  10. 10. Sadiković L, ‘Nadustavni karakter Evropske konvencije o ljudskim pravima u Bosni i Hercegovini’ (2012) 1 Pregled: časopis Za društvena Pitanja 57.
  11. 11. Šarčević E, Dejtonski ustav: Karakteristike i karakteristični problema (Konrad Adenauer Stiftung 2009).
  12. 12. Trnka K, ‘Dometi i izazovi ustavne rekonstrukcije Federacije Bosne i Hercegovine’ (Javni i privatni aspekti nužnih pravnih reformi u Bosnia and Herzegovina: Koliko daleko možemo ići? Zbornik Radova Međunarodna naučna konferencija, Tuzla, 13-14 decembar 2013) 11.
  13. 13. Trnka K, Konstitutivnost naroda: Povodom odluke Ustavnog suda Bosne i Hercegovine o konstitutivnosti Bošnjaka, Hrvata i Srba i na nivou entiteta (VKBI 2000).
  14. 14. Trnka K, ‘Specifičnosti ustavnog uređenja Bosne i Hercegovine’ (2009) 11 Revus 45. doi:10.4000/revus.1102 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4000/revus.1102
  15. 15. Trnka K, Ustavno pravo (2nd edn, Fakultet za javnu upravu 2006).
  16. 16. Vehabović F, Odnos Ustava Bosne i Hercegovine i Evropske konvencije za zaštitu ljudskih prava i osnovnih Sloboda (ACIPS 2006).

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.