##common.pageHeaderLogo.altText##

Research Articles

Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): Issue 1/2025

The Role of Law Enforcement Agencies in the Transitional Justice System: International Practice and the Ukrainian Context

Published
September 9, 2025

Abstract

Background: This article examines the role of law enforcement agencies within the system of transitional justice, with particular attention to international practice and its relevance for Ukraine’s post-conflict recovery. In the aftermath of armed conflicts, regime changes, or systemic violence, societies must simultaneously redress past human rights violations and rebuild public trust in state institutions. As global experience shows, law enforcement bodies occupy a pivotal yet complex position in this process – investigating and prosecuting crimes, contributing to truth-seeking initiatives, protecting victims, and facilitating institutional reform.

The article aims to identify an effective model for the participation of law enforcement agencies in transitional justice, one that balances their retributive, protective, and reconciliatory functions in accordance with international legal standards and public expectations. It argues that the integration of internationally tested practices can enhance the legitimacy of Ukraine’s justice system and promote sustainable reconciliation.

Methods: The methodology combines doctrinal, comparative, and interdisciplinary approaches. The research includes an analysis of international and domestic legal frameworks, comparative case studies (South Africa, Colombia, Rwanda, the former Yugoslavia), and an examination of Ukraine’s legal and institutional environment. Political and sociological insights are also incorporated to contextualize the role of law enforcement in post-conflict societies.

Results and Conclusions: The study finds that law enforcement agencies must undergo both structural and cultural transformation to perform effectively in transitional settings. Their function extends beyond criminal enforcement to securing victims’ rights, strengthening public confidence, and preventing the recurrence of mass abuses. Challenges such as political interference, limited expertise in international crimes, institutional distrust, and resource constraints persist. However, through targeted reforms, international cooperation, and a victim-centred approach, law enforcement institutions can significantly contribute to a just and durable peace.

The article concludes that in Ukraine’s context, establishing a transitional justice framework rooted in accountability, professionalism, and human rights compliance within the law enforcement sector is imperative. Such a system can not only deliver legal redress and reinforce institutional legitimacy but also serve as a model for other nations confronting the legacy of mass violence.

References

  1. 1. Alston P, Report of the Special Rapporteur on Extrajudicial, Summary or Arbitrary Executions: Mission to Kenya (A/HRC/11/2/Add.6, UNHRC 2009).
  2. 2. Clark P, The Gacaca Courts, Post-Genocide Justice and Reconciliation in Rwanda: Justice Without Lawyers (CUP 2010). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511761584
  3. 3. Crenzel E, 'Argentina’s National Commission on the Disappearance of Persons: Contributions to Transitional Justice' (2008) 2(2) International Journal of Transitional Justice 173. doi:10.1093/ijtj/ijn007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/ijn007
  4. 4. de Greiff P, ‘The Role of Apologies in National Reconciliation Processes: On Making Trustworthy Institutions Trusted’ in Gibney M and others (eds), The Age of Apology: Facing up to the Past (University of Pennsylvania Press 2008) 120.
  5. 5. Destrooper T, Engbo L Gissel and Carlson KB (eds), Transitional Justice in Aparadigmatic Contexts: Accountability, Recognition, and Disruption (Transitional Justice, Routledge 2024). DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003289104
  6. 6. Duthie R, Building Trust and Capacity: Civil Society and Transitional Justice from a Development Perspective (ICTJ 2009).
  7. 7. Garms U and Peschke K, ‘War Crimes Prosecution in Bosnia and Herzegovina (1992–2002): An Analysis Through the Jurisprudence of the Human Rights Chamber’ (2006) 4(2) Journal of International Criminal Justice 258. doi:10.1093/jicj/mql015 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mql015
  8. 8. Gready P and Robins S, ‘From Transitional to Transformative Justice: A New Agenda for Practice’ (2014) 8(3) International Journal of Transitional Justice 339. doi:10.1093/ijtj/iju013 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ijtj/iju013
  9. 9. Joinet L, Question of the Impunity of Perpetrators of Human Rights Violations (Civil and Political): Revised Final Report (E/CN.4/Sub.2/1997/20/Rev.1, UN 1997).
  10. 10. Kritz NJ (ed), Transitional Justice: How Emerging Democracies Reckon with Former Regimes, vol 1–3 (United States Institute of Peace Press 1995).
  11. 11. lubell N, Pejic J and Simmons C, Guidelines on Investigating Violations of International Humanitarian Law: Law, Policy and Good Practice (ICRC 2019).
  12. 12. Mayer-Rieckh A and de Greiff P (eds), Justice as Prevention: Vetting Public Employees in Transitional Societies (Advancing Transitional Justice Series, Social Science Research Council 2007).
  13. 13. Minow M, Between Vengeance and Forgiveness: Facing History after Genocide and Mass Violence (Beacon Press 1998).
  14. 14. Olsen TD, Payne LA and Reiter AG, ‘Transitional Justice in the World, 1970–2007: Insights from a New Dataset’ (2010) 47(6) Journal of Peace Research 803. doi:10.1177/0022343310382205 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0022343310382205
  15. 15. Orentlicher D, Impunity : Report of the Independent Expert to Update the Set of Principles to Combat Impunity (E/CN.4/2005/102/Add.1, UN 2005).
  16. 16. Sikkink K, The Justice Cascade: How Human Rights Prosecutions Are Changing World Politics (WW Norton 2011).
  17. 17. Teitel RG, Transitional Justice (OUP 2000). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195100648.001.0001

Similar Articles

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.